Chair of the press, freedom of expression and publishing committee at Kuwait Lawyers Society and the legal advisor, lawyer Adawya Al Dughaishm, has confirmed that the press is one of the most significant modern means for expression opinion, as it is the freedom of the individual to publish whatever he wants by the newspaper and be able to express his opinions through articles, for the intention of informing the public opinion. This may include a criticism of persons or their status and reputation, and usually it may be a component for the slander, insult or humiliation crime.
She explained that in order to reconcile between the two considerations, the required legal controls comprised by the articles of law ere laid down. Al Dughaishm said in a press statement in connection with the remarks on the government's proposals for amendments on the printing and publishing law and the audio-visual law, that the freedom of expression is one of the basic human rights. Among his basic rights is to have freedom of thinking and expression of his opinion. In view of the significance of expression of opinion, it holds a high status in democratic regimes where it is never constrained unless by legal restrictions aimed at placing a reasonable scope for preventing its use as a weapon for harming others.
She pointed that the press may uncover the shortcomings of the society and drive the authorities in charge to reform and perfect this shortcoming, whether from the social, economic or cultural aspects. This basic role of the press requires it to be free in order to perform its mission. Such freedom does not mean it is not responsible for what it publishes, as freedom and responsibility are intertwined.
Further, the press plays a big and significant role in providing the society with knowledge and culture by publishing international and local news and the scientific analyses of the various phenomena of life, as well as the concerns of the community members, deliberations at general meetings and all general matters in the society.
She added: Here is the problem in connection with the press, publishing and circulation of printed matter. The media, particularly the press, has a very significant role for setting up a moral unity between members of the society. The journalist, while fulfilling his social function, perhaps its performance may infringe upon certain persons and authorities, whereby his journalist performance may not be possible in the image required by the general interest without such infringement.
Further, all the legislations have established that this infringement should be permitted to weigh between two rights, one is more significant than the other. The legal ground for this is the (use of right). Each citizen may contribute in the service of the community by the appropriate means without infringing upon the freedom of others whenever possible. If the work of journalism is surrounded by risks, the matter requires the legislator to organize and provide an amount of freedom to the press without restricting such freedom.
She pointed out that the freedom of opinion is one of the basic general freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and the international conventions. The press may uncover the shortcomings of the society and drive the concerned authorities to reform and perfect such shortcomings. This is the basic role of the press which requires it to be free in order to perform its mission. The matter requires the legislator to organize and provide an amount of freedom to the press without restricting this freedom, as there is a difference between organization and restriction.
Al-Dughaishm said "we find that the new printing law contradicts with the provisions of the constitution, specifically articles 36 and 37, which stipulated that the freedom of the press and publish is guaranteed. This means that it may not be exposed to restriction and forfeiting. We note that law 2006/3 followed the footpath of the old law, in connection with the imprisonment sentence of the journalist. It is more suitable to remove any freedom restricting publishing, as the financial compensation penalty is sufficient for deterrence in case of confirming the violation. Therefore, we do not need reinforced punishments, in view of the existence of the civil part related to compensation, and the affected party resorts to the compensation case.
Further, article 22 of law 2006/3 which permitted the minister to prohibit the publishing of any commercial or other advertisings, which is considered as a prior censorship and contradicts with the provision of article 8 of the same law, which determined that the press is not subject to any prior censorship.
Al Dughaishm said "article 29 of law 2006/3 stated that the concerned minister shall pass a decree in connection with the audio prints subject to the provisions of this law, their license fees, inspecting and controlling them and shutting them administratively. It is more important to cancel the provision of article 29 of this law as it imposes a guardianship on the journalists and writers in terms of what is written, or it should be placed within the framework of specific acts, instead of the general guardianship of the Ministry on all the writers and journalists by criminalization.
She added that the provision of article 11 which stipulates prohibiting the license to a firm or company whose capital is less than 250 thousand dinar. This condition has denied individuals from being licensed to publish a newspaper, and is considered and is considered as a disabling condition, which implies that the opinion holder should be the owner of a financial wealth, otherwise he will be denied from his right to publish a newspaper in which he expresses his opinion. The fact is that this conditions represents a real forfeiting of freedom for those who are financially disabled among the opinion makers and those with enlightened ideology. Further, this condition contradicts with the constitution and breaches the principle of equal opportunities between the citizens of the one country.
Al-Dughaisham pointed out that the expressions used by the law for indicating the matters prohibited to be published included loose expressions which carry many interpretation. A number may see in a certain expression an infringement on the dignity of persons, while others see that it does not carry any infringement. Hence, the judgments of the courts differ from one case to the other. This may provoke a number of litigants who see in them a discrimination without justification. Therefore, the matters require placing controls for what is considered as infringement on the personal dignity or what is considered as such, after obtaining the opinion of the concerned parties, and after reviewing the cases in which the judgments were passed and laid down a concept for infringement on the dignity of persons.
As regards the proposal for amendment and addition of a new provision "criminalization of any prohibition of insult, defamation or slander of the National Assembly or Council of Ministers." This proposed provision has laid down a confirmation for shutting the mouths. It will imply loss of the real control over the works of the National Assembly and Council of Ministers.
She confirmed that we reject the amendments proposed on the printing and audio visual laws by reinforcing punishments, as they encroach upon freedoms widely. She pointed out that it is evident from reinforcing the amount of fines to a disabling limit may lead the journalist to imprisonment if he is unable to pay the fine, by a penalty not exceeding six months. This means that placement of the fine is disabling, making imprisonment more likely than payment of these fines, which are exaggerated and make imprisonment a matter which may be necessary in all violations.
Al-Dughaisham called upon the concerned state authorities which endeavor to achieve more freedoms to conduct the required amendments on the printing and publishing law.
Non respond of companies to hold the general assembly is one of the most significant problems of shareholders.